Log In Register
Users Online (1)
Random Picture
Here's lookin at you kid!
Who's Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Latest Posts
Advertisement
Realm Status

Caelestrasz

Normal
Offline (max)
Login / User Stats
Schedule
SMTWTFS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28 
Ventrilo
Lobby
Niccolo
Sentinels Lobby
World of Warcraft
Instance 1
Instance 2
Raid (10 man)
Raid (25 man)
Officers lounge
Check your GS with Oldmerlin
Bears Cave (DND)
Bears Happy Hunting Grounds
Kams Punishment Chamber
Althars Celestial Haven
Space Cow Corral
Llisas lyrical lounge
afk
Holyfawk
WowJutsu
Sentinels of Truth is not yet raid ranked!
Welcome
Welcome to the new guild website! Feel free to look around and drop by our forums!
 

Are you dating a noob?

Posted by AltharAugust 14, 2009 at 2:34 pm

Obsidum Sanctum Sartharion

Posted by AltharAugust 3, 2009 at 5:15 pm

Maexxna 10 man raid

Posted by AltharAugust 2, 2009 at 10:35 am

HEEE TEEE HEEE HAHAHA

Posted by AltharJuly 28, 2009 at 11:42 pm

Another funny video

Posted by AltharJuly 26, 2009 at 9:02 am

WoW Facing Perm Suspension

Posted by KorikJuly 15, 2009 at 10:13 am
According to a source, the General Administration of Press and Publication of PRC has assigned Shanghai News and Publication Bureau to make a thorough investigation into the issue relating to the joint venture established by Blizzard Entertainment and NetEase. If it is proved that this joint venture is established to operate games, NetEase and Blizzard will be punished for violating the relevant regulations of China.

The US-based Blizzard Entertainment (a subsidiary of Activision Blizzard Inc, NASDAQ:ATVI, hereinafter referred to as "Blizzard"), renowned for the successful launch of World of Warcraft in China, is now trying to play "edge ball" against China's regulatory policy. As for the operation of World of Warcraft and other games in China, Blizzard is no longer content with the role of game provider any more, instead, it's trying to achieve "absolute control" through various methods.

Several Chinese online game operators analyzed, "The licensing mode grants foreign game developers little control over channels and clients, and they consequently receive drastically less revenue from the game." In such situation, how to effectively evade policy supervision so as to actually control the operation of their online game products in China has become one of the important strategic concerns of some foreign online game developers.

The Chinese law stipulates that, foreign enterprises are not allowed to operate online games in the Chinese market in the form of wholly owned company or joint venture. On April 16, 2009, Blizzard and NetEase jointly announced that the operating right of World of Warcraft in China Mainland would be handed over to NetEase after the contract with The9 expired. Since then, there have been many rumors about how NetEase had obtained the operating right of the "No. 1 online game in the world" in China. There are two issues most concerned by the people. One is NetEase paid a sky-high revenue share to Blizzard, which will quadruple the gains of Blizzard compared to the gains obtained from the cooperation with The9. And the other is Blizzard and NetEase established a joint venture to operate World of Warcraft and other games in the name of providing technical support. And particularly, recently some medias analyzed the relevant information disclosed in the financial statements (20-F) of 2008 submitted by NetEase, which attracted the attention of the game industry and the relevant competent authorities. It's learned that the government authority in charge of investigating this case has obtained a great deal of relevant information.

Because recently, many game medias and players are paying close attention to World of Warcraf's operating right transition, and because it relates to the key question whether joint venture companies can operate games in China, the General Administration of Press and Publication of PRC has specially assigned Shanghai News and Publication Bureau to investigate deep into this case. Industry analysts pointed out that, because the case involves some major regulations and policies, it's highly likely that the approval of World of Warcraft operating right transition will have been suspended before the investigation results come out.


Original Post here.

TIER 9 Preview

Posted by KorikJuly 7, 2009 at 11:03 am
n patch 3.2, Call of the Crusade, players will be able to work toward the all-new tier-9 class sets by competing in the Crusaders' Coliseum. To keep with the themes of the Argent Tournament, players will notice this time around that the Horde and Alliance have unique looks to distinguish them apart.

Alliance Mage



Horde Hunter




Alliance Priest



Horde Shaman



Alliance Warlock


Faction-Change Service

Posted by KorikJune 30, 2009 at 11:45 am
We wanted to give everyone a very early heads-up that, in response to player requests, we’re developing a new service for World of Warcraft that will allow players to change their faction from Alliance to Horde or Horde to Alliance. There’s still much work to do and many details to iron out, but the basic idea is that players will be able to use the service to transform an existing character into a roughly equivalent character of the opposing faction on the same realm. Players who ended up creating and leveling up characters on the opposite factions from their friends have been asking for this type of functionality for some time, and we’re pleased to be getting closer to being able to deliver it.

As with all of the features and services we offer, we intend to incorporate the faction-change service in a way that won’t disrupt the gameplay experience on the realms, and there will be some rules involved with when and how the service can be used. The number of variables involved increases the complexity of implementing this service, but we plan to take the time needed to ensure that it lives up to expectations before officially rolling it out. We’ll go into much more detail on all of this here at http://www.WorldofWarcraft.com as development progresses. In the meantime, we wanted to let you know that because this type of functionality requires extensive internal testing well in advance of release, you may be seeing bits and pieces of the service in the test builds we use for the public test realms moving forward.


Original Post [here]